Chapter 5. Conclusions.

In previous chapters of our investigation we have done some interme-diate conclusions and suppositions. And now as we have new dates of su-pernova star flashes, these conclusions would be corrected. We would not make any amendments to the already written material for the Reader to follow the course of our reasoning.
Let us continue our work.
Casual � and � consequentive relationship � Supernova star � Solar Eclipse � starting mechanism of ethnogenesis - may described now by us in detail for every passionary drive. We shall mark the supernova star by means of the date of Solar Eclipse for more conveniences.

1. Supernova star of 1000 � Solar Eclipse dd. 7th April 1000- incubation period (about 150 years) � passionary drive along the axis of Central Arabia, Inda Valley, Tibet, China, Korea, Japan.
Following Skaliger�s chronology, L. N. Gumilev dated this explosion back to 6th centure A. D..
Our investigation shows that this ethnogenesis explosion took place late 11 centure � beginning 12 centure A. D..
These dates may be somewhat moved to both directions, as the state-ment on incubation period for about 150 years is a little bit conditional.

2. Supernova star of 1026 � Solar Eclipse dd. 12th November 1026 � incu-bation period � passionary drive along the axis of Mongolia, Manchuria.
L. N. Gumilev dated back this explosion to 11th centure.
Our investigation shows the 11- 12th centure.

3. Supernova star of 1133 A. D. � Solar Eclipses dd. 2nd August 1133 and 23rd July 1134 � incubation period � passionary drive along the axis of Southern Sweden, Rumania, Asia Minor, Syria, Palestine, Abissinia.
L. N. Gumilev dates this ethnogenesis explosion back to 1 centure A. D..
Our investigation shows that this explosion took place in 12-13 centure.

4. Supernova star of 1187 � Solar Eclipses dd. 4th September 1187 and 24th August 1188 � incubation period � passionary drive along the axis of Lithuania, Rus, Asia Minor, Ethiopia.
L. N. Gumilev dates this ethnogenesis explosion back to 13th centure.
Our investigation speaks about the 13th centure.
Note. Passionary drive of the supposed 1st centure duplicates passionary drive of 13th centure in the region of the trajectory Asia Minor, Syria, Palestine, Ethiopia.

5. Supernova star of 1310 � Solar Eclipse dd. 31st January 1310 � incuba-tion period � passionary drive along the axis of Spain, France, Southern Norway.
L. N. Gumilev dates this explosion back to 8th centure.
Our investigation shows the 14-15 centuries.
One obstacle impedes the acceptance of passionary drive dates. It is � faith in Skaliger�s chronology.
It is necessary to indicate that up to 11th centure new dates coincide satisfactorily with Skaliger�s chronology, and after 11th centure � do not coincide at all. Is there any clarification to such a state of things? It turned out that there is.
Even late 70-s of the previous centure A. T. Fomenko and the group of mathematicians analyzed the traditional historical chronology and came to a conclusion that it has significant system errors, and it is wrong at all after the 10th centure A. D..
Our investigation gives the same results.
A.T. Fomenko proved that in Skaliger�s chronology there is duplicat-ing of historical events.
It is vividly seen at our scheme of supernova star flashes.
Beginning our investigation we did not intend to analyze the truth of traditional chronology in such detailed way. This subject arose in course of work itself and it is not the main one for us.
Nevertheless it is necessary to admit the evident fact. Two independ-ent investigations on the truth of Skaliger�s chronology, fundamental one of A. T. Fomenko and his like-minded persons and, of course, our investi-gation led to one result. The fact is quite eloquent.
On the basis of it we consider Skaliger�s chronology before 10th cen-ture to be completely incorrect, and that is why the obstacle in the accep-tance of the dates of supernova star flashes is far-fetched. It is more of psychological nature.
Now we can make a conclusion that our investigation showed the presence of temporary and spatial (geographical) connection of the phe-nomena of supernova star flash, Solar Eclipse and ethnogenesis explosion.
We suppose that for such a specific topic this information is quite enough to declare the fact of supernova star impact on ethnogenesis.
For moral reasons it is not correct to set a question on experiments.
The result of our investigation is indicated on the map with some cor-rections of axises of passionary drives and new period intervals of eth-nogenesis explosion.